🔗 Share this article

In my role as a game master, I historically shied away from heavy use of chance during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. I preferred was for narrative flow and session development to be guided by deliberate decisions as opposed to the roll of a die. That said, I opted to change my approach, and I'm incredibly happy with the result.

The Spark: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

A popular podcast utilizes a DM who often requests "luck rolls" from the participants. He does this by picking a specific dice and defining consequences contingent on the number. This is at its core no distinct from consulting a pre-generated chart, these are devised spontaneously when a course of events has no predetermined resolution.

I chose to experiment with this technique at my own table, primarily because it appeared interesting and presented a break from my standard routine. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the ongoing balance between pre-determination and spontaneity in a D&D campaign.

An Emotional Session Moment

In a recent session, my party had concluded a massive conflict. Afterwards, a player asked about two friendly NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. Instead of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: a low roll, both died; on a 5-9, a single one would die; on a 10+, they made it.

Fate decreed a 4. This resulted in a profoundly poignant sequence where the characters came upon the bodies of their allies, still holding hands in their final moments. The cleric held a ceremony, which was uniquely powerful due to earlier roleplaying. In a concluding gesture, I improvised that the remains were strangely restored, containing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the bead's contained spell was perfectly what the party lacked to solve another major story problem. One just orchestrate this type of serendipitous moments.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This incident caused me to question if randomization and making it up are truly the core of D&D. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your skill to pivot may atrophy. Adventurers often find joy in ignoring the most carefully laid plots. Therefore, a skilled DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and create scenarios in real-time.

Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a great way to develop these skills without straying too much outside your comfort zone. The key is to apply them for minor decisions that don't fundamentally change the session's primary direction. As an example, I would avoid using it to determine if the central plot figure is a traitor. But, I would consider using it to decide whether the party arrive just in time to see a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Player Agency

This technique also helps maintain tension and create the feeling that the adventure is alive, progressing according to their decisions as they play. It prevents the sense that they are merely pawns in a pre-written narrative, thereby strengthening the cooperative aspect of roleplaying.

This approach has historically been part of the original design. The game's roots were enamored with random tables, which made sense for a playstyle focused on exploration. While contemporary D&D frequently emphasizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they must prep extensively, that may not be the only path.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely no issue with doing your prep. Yet, there is also no problem with stepping back and allowing the rolls to determine certain outcomes rather than you. Authority is a significant aspect of a DM's job. We use it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to release it, even when doing so can lead to great moments.

The core suggestion is this: Do not fear of letting go of the reins. Experiment with a little randomness for minor details. The result could discover that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you could have planned on your own.