🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts suggested that changing their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system favors male users who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decline significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "assertive" style

The result was immediate: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were more personal - concise and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" reported a reduction in reach and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing significantly reduced exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."